Today's Lie Detector Tests | EyeDetect - The eyes don't lie.

Learn the truth about today’s lie detector tests or methods. See the pros and cons and accuracy rates of the most popular methods in use.

The Truth about Today's Lie Detector Tests

There is no such thing as a lie detector. However, there are various instruments today that measure aspects of physiological changes, which scientists have associated with deception.

When certain physical changes occur during a lie detector test—under controlled conditions while questions are asked—a person may appear “guilty” based on their physiological reaction.

Some physiological changes measured during lie detector testing include:

 • Heart Rate  • Pupil Dilation  • Body Movements
 • Blood Pressure  • Eye Fixations  • Leg Movements
 • Respiration  • Blink Rate  • Question Response Time
 • Skin Conductance  • Brain Activity  • Question Error Rate

Through scientific studies conducted with EyeDetect, specific physiological changes have been shown to be similar among liars. This means that EyeDetect can be an effective lie detector test.

Note: There is no perfect lie detector test. All tests have a margin of error. They can give false-positive results and false-negative results. EyeDetect minimizes false positives (when an innocent person looks guilty).

digital body_

Infidelity Tests: To learn more about lie detector tests for a cheating spouse, cheating partner, cheating fiancee, cheating BF, or cheating GF, visit.

Lying takes more mental effort.

 • It takes more thought to create bogus dates, times, places and people.

 • It takes more thought to maintain consistency and believability in a fake story.

 • It takes more thought to monitor behavior when questioned—to keep things believable.

Today’s Lie Detector Tests

Most organizations rely on one, some, or none of the following lie detector testing methods:

 • Personal interview
 • Personality test
 • Integrity test
 • Voice stress analyzer
 • Electroencephalogram
 • fMRI
 • Polygraph
 • EyeDetect (ocular-motor test)


Research shows most lie detector test solutions have “issues.”

 • Personal interview = 54% accurate at detecting deception
 • Personality test = do not measure or detect deception
 • Integrity test = up to 64% accurate at detecting deception
 • Voice stress analyzer = 65% accurate at detecting deception
 • Electroencephalogram = 87% accurate at detecting deception, but very invasive
 • fMRI = 72% accurate at detecting deception, but very costly
 • Polygraph = one of the most accurate, but exams are expensive, take time, are invasive, and are difficult to keep a safe social distance

Human Lie Detector Test

Because of movies and TV shows, most people think liars avoid eye contact, cover their mouths, make mistakes when speaking, touch their body, fidget, etc.

Avoiding eye contact_

Studies show these behaviors are not reliable indicators of deception.

Why? A skilled liar can respond to tests questions with a high degree of accuracy, which makes them seem believable. But, giving correct answers does not prove innocence.

For example, if a parent found their 5-year-old child in the kitchen eating cookies and asked, “Are you eating cookies?” The typical child would answer, “No.” And, “no” is the answer expected from someone being tested, but the child is obviously lying about eating cookies.

Although human lie detectors are generally inaccurate at detecting deception, there are a few verbal cues that liars tend to exhibit when telling a concocted “story.”

Those verbal cues common to liars include:
  • Use of more negative statements
  • Give shorter responses, i.e., don’t want to tell you much
  • Give explanations that are not very believable
  • Make fewer self-references to keep themselves out of the story
  • Change the subject – avoidance or deflection
  • Distance themselves from others involved
  • Give inconsistent facts
  • Tend to memorize their story and give it verbatim each time asked

Source: Vrij, 2008

Challenges with Some Lie Detector Testing Methods

Organizations commonly rely on a favorite lie detector testing method such as those previously mentioned. Here is a brief description of each of those lie detector tests and their reported rates of accuracy.

Personal Interview

Concerned about being believed, liars often seem helpful and truthful in an interview, and put more effort into impressing their interviewer. Because of that, personal interviews are not very accurate at detecting deception.

>> Accuracy in the detection of deception: 54%
>> Source: Bond & DePaulo, 2006

girl waiting interview_

Personality Tests

These tests do not measure deception.

They are used to see if a person is a good fit in the company culture or if there is a good fit from a behavioral perspective. As such, there is no reported rate of accuracy at detection deception.

Journal of Applied Psychology

Integrity Tests

A study conducted by researchers in 2012 evaluated over 100 integrity tests from test publishers and non-publishers to determine if they were accurate at predicting job performance, training performance, counterproductive work behavior (such as substance abuse, theft, withdrawal, etc.) and employee turnover.

These tests have a low predictive value for behavior. Most data are gathered from self-reporting participants, who easily fake their responses.

>>Accuracy in the detection of deception: 53-64%
>>Source: The Criterion-Related Validity of Integrity Tests, Journal of Applied Psychology, 2012.

Voice Stress Analyzer

This lie detector testing method is based on the premise that small, involuntary frequency modulations occur in the voice when under the stress of lying. Essentially, muscles in the voice box tighten or loosen, which changes the sound of the voice.

A precision instrument must be used to measure these slight frequency modulations. They cannot be heard with a human ear. But, the accuracy slightly better than tossing a coin.

>>Accuracy in the detection of deception: 50-65%
>>Source: Journal of Forensic Sciences, 53(1), 183-193, 2008.

doc analyzing mri_


Using probes attached to a person’s skull, the EEG measures electrical activity at the surface of the brain. It compares familiar and unfamiliar stimuli (i.e., the person sees a friend vs. a stranger). The comparisons are used to determine when someone is lying.

>>Accuracy of the EEG in the detection of deception: 87%
>>Source: various research papers

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)

Using powerful magnets to charge hydrogen protons within cells, the fMRI translates radio frequencies that are absorbed or reflected into an image of the area of the brain scanned. A map is created of pattern vectors associated with specific cognitive states.

A radiologist predicts the cognitive state by observing these patterns and looks at changes in whole-brain patterns to predict the cognitive state the brain is experiencing.

>>Accuracy in the detection of deception: 72%
>>>Source: National Academy of Sciences, February 2014.

doc analyzing mri_
polygraph chart


An instrument that gathers multiple signals from sensors attached to a subject. Signals include cardiovascular, respiratory, and electrodermal activity. In simple terms, these are breathing activity, heart rate, blood pressure, and sweat/skin conductance. Measurements are recorded and analyzed to detect these physiological changes and correlate them to statements made about questions.

>>Average accuracy in the detection of deception: 87%
>>Source: American Polygraph Association Meta-analytic survey, Table 2, 2011.


A computer with a high-definition eye tracker measures involuntary changes in the eyes and reading behaviors while a person answers true/false questions. These measurements have been shown to be associated with increases in cognitive load, which have been associated with deception.

>>Accuracy in the detection of deception: 88%
>>Source: A. Potts Dissertation, University of Utah, 2020

View More:

Why do people fail lie detector tests?

There are two primary reasons: (1) The person is guilty and has lied, OR (2) The person is innocent, but their body reacted similarly to a guilty person.


In laboratory studies where conditions are controlled, innocent and guilty subjects are observed, and information is gathered about how each group reacts to lie detector test questions.

Patterns of behavior are established for each group and that information is applied (generalized) to anyone who shows the same patterns of behavior when tested.

For example, in laboratory studies where EyeDetect was used, guilty subjects showed the following behaviors when tested:

 • Have more pupil dilation
 • Respond faster to questions
 • Make more mistakes responding to questions
 • Blink less
 • Read questions faster

Can an innocent person fail a lie detector test?

Yes, if that innocent person reacts similarly to a guilty person during testing. There are a few reasons for such reactions, which could include the following possibilities:

 • The person is a victim of a crime for which they are being questioned.
 • The person is a witness to a crime for which they are being questioned.
 • The person committed a similar crime, but not the specific one being questioned.
 • The person had indirect involvement in a crime and enabled or facilitated it.
 • The person is covering for someone known to be involved in a crime.
 • When tested, the person was preoccupied and worried about a different crime committed.
 • The person misunderstood the test questions.
 • The examiner used equipment that was not correctly calibrated.
 • The examiner modified the test results to the detriment of the person being tested.

woman shoulder shrug_


When a lie detector testing is needed, EyeDetect is the most accurate, least expensive, and least invasive of the various methods mentioned here.

It also allows the examiner to maintain a safe social distance from the examinee.

There are 9 peer-reviewed scientific articles supporting the accuracy claims made in this article. To read those scientifically validated studies, click